Why Software Testing Matters in Preclinical Trials for the Pharma Industry?

Why Software Testing Matters in Preclinical Trials for the Pharma Industry?

Preclinical trials play a critical role in the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on ensuring a new drug’s safety and efficacy before testing it in humans. As part of this process, preclinical software testing has emerged as an essential element in modern drug development. It ensures systems for managing, analyzing, and reporting preclinical data function correctly, securely, and comply with industry standards.

Preclinical trials are the foundational steps in the drug development process. Laboratories and researchers conduct these experiments on animals to gather crucial data on a drug’s safety, efficacy, and pharmacological properties before testing it on humans.

In the complex, regulated world of drug development, preclinical trials form the foundation for pharmaceutical advancements. These trials are the first step in bringing a new drug from the lab to the patient’s bedside.

Why are preclinical trials crucial?

  • Safety: Identifying potential side effects and toxicities early on protects human volunteers in clinical trials.
  • Efficacy: Evaluating a drug’s effectiveness in treating a specific disease or condition.  
  • Dosage: Determining the optimal dosage for human use.  
  • Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted, and how it exerts its therapeutic effects.
  • Regulatory Approval: Regulatory bodies, like the FDA, mandate thorough preclinical testing before approving a drug’s progression to human clinical trials. This ensures that only drugs with a reasonable safety profile move forward.
  • Risk Reduction: Preclinical trials identify issues early, reducing the risk of failure in costly later stages like clinical trials.
Preclinical software testing

Definition and Role of Preclinical Trials

Preclinical trials are the phase of drug development that occurs before clinical trials (testing in humans) can begin. They involve a series of laboratory tests, animal studies designed to provide detailed information on drug’s safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. These trials are crucial for identifying potential issues early, ensuring that only most promising drug candidates proceed to human testing.

Safety Evaluation and Toxic Effect Identification

Primary Objective: The foremost goal of preclinical trials is to assess the safety profile of a new drug candidate. Before any new drug can be tested in humans, it must be evaluated for potential toxic effects in animals. This includes identifying any adverse reactions that could occur.

Toxicology Studies: These studies aim to find a drug’s potential toxicity, identify affected organs, and determine harmful dosage levels. Understanding these parameters is critical to ensuring that the drug is safe enough to move forward into human trials

Testing in Animal Models

Proof of Concept: Preclinical trials help establish whether a drug is effective in treating the intended condition. Researchers conduct in vitro and in vivo experiments to determine if the drug achieves the desired therapeutic effects.

Mechanism of Action: These trials also help in understanding the mechanism by which the drug works, providing insights into its potential effectiveness and helping to refine the drug’s design and formulation.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Analysis

Drug Behavior: Preclinical studies examine how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body (pharmacokinetics). They also investigate the drug’s biological effects and its mechanisms (pharmacodynamics).

Dose Optimization: Understanding these properties is crucial for determining the appropriate dosing regimen for human trials, ensuring that the drug reaches the necessary therapeutic levels without causing toxicity.

Regulatory Compliance and Approval Requirements

Compliance: Regulatory agencies like the FDA, EMA, and other national health authorities mandate preclinical testing before any new drug can proceed to clinical trials. These trials must adhere to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standards, ensuring that the studies are scientifically valid and ethically conducted.

Data Submission: The data generated from preclinical trials are submitted to regulatory bodies as part of an Investigational New Drug (IND) application, which is required to obtain approval to commence human clinical trials.

Ethical Considerations and Alternatives to Animal Testing

Patient Protection: Protecting human volunteers from unnecessary risks is a paramount ethical obligation. Preclinical trials serve to ensure that only drug candidates with a reasonable safety and efficacy profile are tested in humans, thereby safeguarding participant health and well-being.

Alternatives to Animal Testing: There is growing interest in alternative methods, such as in vitro testing using cell cultures, computer modeling, and organ-on-a-chip technologies, which can reduce the need for animal testing and provide additional insights.

Future Advancements in Preclinical Research

Technological Innovations: Advances in biotechnology, such as CRISPR gene editing, high-throughput screening, and artificial intelligence, are poised to revolutionize preclinical research. These technologies can enhance the precision and efficiency of preclinical studies, leading to more accurate predictions of human responses.

Personalized Medicine: The future of preclinical trials also lies in personalized medicine, where drugs are tailored to the genetic makeup of individual patients. This approach can improve the safety and efficacy of treatments, making preclinical trials more relevant and predictive.

Summary of Significance and Impact

Preclinical trials are a vital step in the drug development pipeline, ensuring that new pharmaceuticals are safe, effective, and ready for human testing. By rigorously evaluating potential drugs in these early stages, the pharmaceutical industry not only complies with regulatory standards but also upholds its commitment to patient safety and innovation. Understanding the importance of preclinical trials provides valuable insights into the meticulous and challenging process of developing new therapies that can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Role of Preclinical Software Testing in Trials:

Software plays a significant role in preclinical trials, especially in the analysis and management of data. Here’s how software testing is associated with preclinical trials:

  1. Data Management and Analysis: Software is used to manage the vast amount of data generated during preclinical trials. This includes data from various experiments, toxicology studies, and efficacy tests. Software testing ensures that these systems function correctly and handle data accurately.
  2. Simulation and Modeling: Computational models and simulations are often used in preclinical studies to predict how a drug might behave in a biological system. Testing these software models ensures that they are reliable and produce valid predictions.
  3. Regulatory Compliance: Software used in preclinical trials must comply with regulations such as Good Laboratory Practices (GLP). Testing ensures that the software meets these regulatory requirements, which is crucial for the acceptance of trial results by regulatory bodies.
  4. Integration with Laboratory Equipment: Software often controls or interacts with laboratory equipment used in preclinical trials. Thoroughly testing this software is essential to ensure accurate data collection and reliable results.

When it comes to FDA approval, the testing process for drugs and associated systems, including preclinical software testing, involves several critical aspects.

1. Data Integrity and Accuracy:

  • Testing Focus: As a manual tester, the goal is to ensure that all data entered and stored in the system maintains its integrity and remains free from corruption or unintended changes. This involves testing scenarios related to data entry, storage, modification, and retrieval, verifying that the system accurately processes and displays the data.
  • Testing Strategy: Testers should manually verify that data cleaning processes work as expected, identifying and flagging any inconsistencies or errors. They must also confirm that the system correctly implements validation rules, ensuring data accuracy.

2. Compliance with Good Laboratory Practices (GLP):

  • Testing Focus: Testing involves verifying that the software adheres to the standards set by GLP.This includes checking that the system correctly captures changes made to data in the audit trails and retains the data as per GLP regulations.
  • Testing Strategy: Manual testers should create, modify, and delete data to ensure that they accurately record all activities in the audit trails. Testers must also verify that the system follows data retention policies and ensures data is available for the required retention period.

3. Electronic Records and Signatures:

  • Testing Focus: Test the functionality of electronic records and signatures to ensure they meet the FDA’s 21 CFR Part 11 requirements, which govern the use of electronic documentation in place of paper records.
  • Testing Strategy: Testers must verify the accuracy and security of electronic records, ensuring they can create, store, and retrieve them without error. They should test electronic signatures to confirm they are secure, traceable, and properly linked to the corresponding record.

4. Validation of Computational Models:

  • Testing Focus: Validating computational models manually, as part of preclinical software testing, involves ensuring that the outputs generated are accurate and consistent with expected results, especially when dealing with predictive models in drug trials.
  • Testing Strategy: A tester should manually verify model predictions by comparing results with known experimental data and run tests to identify any sensitivity in the models to input variations.

5. Risk Management:

  • Testing Focus: In a manual testing environment, identifying and mitigating risks is essential. Testers must test for potential risks like system crashes, data breaches, or calculation errors and implement appropriate responses.
  • Testing Strategy: Use risk-based testing to identify high-priority areas that could present the greatest risks to the system. Manual testers must ensure that risk mitigation strategies (like data backup and failover systems) function as intended.

6. Regulatory Submissions:

  • Testing Focus: Manual testing ensures accurate system data compilation for regulatory submission, maintaining compliance and preventing errors effectively.
  • Testing Strategy: Testers must manually ensure submission packages include correctly formatted documents and data, verifying completeness and regulatory compliance. They must ensure the system presents the data in a clear and compliant format.

These aspects collectively ensure that manual testing plays a critical role in delivering reliable, accurate, and FDA-compliant software systems. Each testing step ensures quality control, identifies risks, and verifies software behavior matches real-world expectations.

Conclusion:

In the pharmaceutical world, preclinical trials are essential for ensuring drug safety and effectiveness. Preclinical software testing ensures system validation, guaranteeing data accuracy and reliability in trials, playing a crucial behind-the-scenes role. This work helps pave the way for successful drug development, making testers key players in advancing medical innovation.

Click here for more blogs on software testing and test automation.

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Effective Test Automation

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Effective Test Automation

KPIs for Test Automation are measurable criteria that demonstrate how effectively the automation testing process supports the organization’s objectives. These metrics assess the success of automation efforts and specific activities within the testing domain. KPIs for test automation are crucial for monitoring progress toward quality goals, evaluating testing efficiency over time, and guiding decisions based on data-driven insights. They encompass metrics tailored to ensure thorough testing coverage, defect detection rates, testing cycle times, and other critical aspects of testing effectiveness.

Importance of KPIs

  • Performance Measurement: Key performance indicators (KPIs) offer measurable metrics to gauge the performance and effectiveness of automated testing efforts. They monitor parameters such as test execution times, test coverage, and defect detection rates, providing insights into the overall efficacy of the testing process KPIs will help your team improve testing skills
  • Identifying Challenges and Problems: Key performance indicators (KPIs) assist in pinpointing bottlenecks or challenges within the test automation framework. By monitoring metrics such as test error rates, script consistency, and resource allocation, KPIs illuminate areas needing focus or enhancement to improve the dependability and scalability of automated testing.
  • Optimizing Resource Utilization: Key performance indicators (KPIs) facilitate improved allocation of resources by pinpointing areas where automated efforts are highly effective and where manual intervention might be required. This strategic optimization aids in maximizing the utilization of testing resources and minimizing costs associated with testing activities.
  • Facilitating Ongoing Enhancement: Key performance indicators (KPIs) support continual improvement by establishing benchmarks and objectives for testing teams. They motivate teams to pursue elevated standards in automation scope, precision, and dependability, fostering a culture of perpetual learning and refinement of testing proficiency.

Benefits of KPIs:

  • Test Coverage clear objective: KPIs will help an unbiased view of the effectiveness of automation testing you with the help
  • Process Enhancement: KPIs highlight the areas for improvement while doing automation testing processes. So you can achieve continuous enhancement & efficiency.
  • Executive Insight: Sharing KPIs with the team will have transparency & a better understanding of what test automation can achieve
  • Process Tracking: Regular monitoring of KPIs tracks the status and progress of automated testing, ensuring alignment with goals and timelines.

KPIs For Test Automation:

1. Test Coverage:

Description: Test coverage refers to the proportion of your application code that is tested. It ensures that your automated testing encompasses all key features and functions. Achieving high test coverage is crucial for reducing the risk of defects reaching production and can also reduce manual efforts.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM): Maps test cases to requirements to ensure that all requirements are covered by tests.
  • User Story Coverage: Measures the percentage of user stories that have been tested.

Tools to Measure Test Coverage:

  • Requirement Management Tools: Jira, HP ALM, Rally
  • Test Management Tools: TestRail, Zephyr, QTest
  • Code Coverage Tools: Clover, J aCoCo, Istanbul, Cobertura

2. Test Execution Time:

Description: This performance metric gauges the time required to run a test suite. Effective automation testing, indicated by shorter execution times, is critical for the deployment of software in a DevOps setting. Efficient test execution supports seamless continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) workflows, ensuring prompt software releases and updates.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Total Test Execution Time: Total time taken to execute all test cases in a test suite.
  • Average Execution Time per Test Case: Average time taken to execute an individual test case.

Tools to Measure Test Execution Time:

  • CI/CD Tools: Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI
  • Test Automation Tools: Selenium, TestNG, JUnit

3. Test Failure Rate:

Description: This metric in automation measures the percentage of test cases that fail during a specific build or over a set period. It is determined by dividing the number of failed tests by the total number of tests executed and multiplying the result by 100 to express it as a percentage. Tracking this rate helps identify problematic areas in the code or test environment, facilitating timely fixes and enhancing overall software quality. Maintaining a low failure rate is essential for ensuring the stability and reliability of the application throughout the testing lifecycle.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Failure Rate Per Build: Percentage of test cases that fail in each build.
  • Historical Failure Trends: Trends in test failure rates over time.

Tools to Measure Test Failure Rate:

  • CI/CD Tools: Jenkins, Bamboo, GitLab CI
  • Test Management Tools: TestRail, Zephyr, QTest
  • Defect Tracking Tools: Jira, Bugzilla, HP ALM

4. Active Defects:

Description: Active defects represent the present state of issues, encompassing new, open, or resolved defects, guiding the team in determining appropriate resolutions. The team sets a threshold for monitoring these defects, taking immediate action on those that surpass this limit.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Defect Count: Number of active defects at any given time.
  • Defect Aging: Time taken to resolve defects from the time they were identified.

Tools to Measure Active Defects:

  • Defect Tracking Tools: Jira, Bugzilla, HP ALM
  • Test Management Tools: TestRail, Zephyr, QTest

5. Build Stability:

Description: Build stability in automation helps measure the reliability and consistency of application builds. You can check how frequently builds pass or fail during automation. Monitoring build stability helps your team identify failures early, and maintaining build stability is necessary for continuous delivery (CI/CD) workflows.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Pass/Fail Rate: Percentage of builds that pass versus those that fail.
  • Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR): Average time taken to fix a failed build.

Tools to Measure Build Stability:

  • CI/CD Tools: Jenkins, TeamCity, Bamboo
  • Monitoring Tools: New Relic, Splunk, Nagios

6. Defect Density:

Description: Defect density measures the number of defects found in a module or piece of code per unit size (e.g., lines of code, function points). It helps in identifying areas of the code that are more prone to defects.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Defects per KLOC (Thousand Lines of Code): Number of defects found per thousand lines of code.
  • Defects per Function Point: Number of defects found per function point.

Tools to Measure Defect Density:

  • Static Code Analysis Tools: SonarQube, PMD, Checkmarx
  • Defect Tracking Tools: Jira, Bugzilla, HP ALM

7. Test Case Effectiveness:

Description: Test case effectiveness measures how well the test cases are able to detect defects. It is calculated by the number of defects detected divided by the total number of defects.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Defects Detected by Tests: Number of defects detected by automated tests.
  • Total Defects: Total number of defects detected including those found in production.

Tools to Measure Test Case Effectiveness:

  • Test Management Tools: TestRail, Zephyr, QTest
  • Defect Tracking Tools:  Jira, Bugzilla, HP ALM

8. Test Automation ROI (Return on Investment):

Description: This KPI measures the financial benefit gained from automation versus the cost incurred to implement and maintain it. It helps in justifying the investment in test automation.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Cost Savings from Reduced Manual Testing: Savings from reduced manual testing efforts.
  • Automation Implementation Costs: Costs incurred in implementing and maintaining automation.

Tools to Measure Test Automation ROI:

  • Project Management Tools: MS Project, Smartsheet, Asana
  • Test Management Tools: TestRail, Zephyr, QTest

9. Test Case Reusability:

Description: This metric measures the extent to which test cases can be reused across different projects or modules. Higher reusability indicates efficient and modular test case design.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Reusable Test Cases: Number of test cases reused in multiple projects.
  • Total Test Cases: Total number of test cases created.

Tools to Measure Test Case Reusability:

  • Test Management Tools: TestRail, Zephyr, QTest
  • Automation Frameworks: Selenium, Cucumber, Robot Framework

10. Defect Leakage:

Description: Defect leakage measures the number of defects that escape to production after testing. Lower defect leakage indicates more effective testing.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Defects Found in Production: Number of defects found in production.
  • Total Defects Found During Testing: Total number of defects found during testing phases.

Tools to Measure Defect Leakage:

  • Defect Tracking Tools: Jira, Bugzilla, HP ALM
  • Monitoring Tools: New Relic, Splunk, Nagios

11. Automation Test Maintenance Effort:

Description: This KPI measures the effort required to maintain and update automated tests. Lower maintenance effort indicates more robust and adaptable test scripts.

Examples of Measurements:

  • Time Spent on Test Maintenance: Total time spent on maintaining and updating test scripts.
  • Number of Test Scripts Updated: Number of test scripts that required updates.

Tools to Measure Automation Test Maintenance Effort:

  • Test Management Tools: TestRail, Zephyr, QTest
  • Version Control Systems: Git.

Conclusion:

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are crucial for ensuring the quality and reliability of applications. Metrics like test coverage, test execution time, test failure rate, active defects, and build stability offer valuable insights into the testing process. By following these KPIs, teams can detect defects early and uphold high software quality standards. Implementing and monitoring these metrics supports effective development cycles and facilitates seamless integration and delivery in CI/CD workflows.

Click here for more blogs on software testing and test automation.