Static testing and dynamic testing are two essential approaches in software testing. While dynamic testing involves software execution, static testing examines work products, such as code or documentation, without execution. Static testing includes two methods: manual examination, where team members review work products to identify issues, and tool-driven evaluation, where specialized software tools perform static analysis.
Static testing is a critical technique as it can identify errors and defects in the software development lifecycle before software execution takes place. This can save time and resources by catching issues early, leading to improved software quality. Static testing also helps in improving the maintainability of the software and reducing the cost of testing by identifying issues early on. By detecting defects early, static testing can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the entire software development process.
What are Reviews in Software Testing:
In software testing, a review is a process of examining a software product or component by a group of individuals to detect defects, errors, or vulnerabilities. The primary goal of reviews is to identify and fix issues in the early stages of the software development life cycle to save time and cost.
Reviews play a crucial role in the software development process. It identifies and addresses errors and issues before they become problematic. Reviews can be informal or formal, depending on the level of rigor and structure involved.
Informal reviews are often less structured and involve team members informally reviewing code or other work products and discussing issues. On the other hand, formal reviews are more structured, involving documented procedures, and a diverse team with varied roles and perspectives, making them comprehensive.
Formal reviews typically produce documented results, including any issues identified and how they were resolved. This documentation is useful for tracking progress, ensuring accountability, and improving future reviews’ quality. Overall, reviews are essential to the software development process as they ensure the software is of high quality and meets the desired requirements.
Reasons why Reviews are Important:
- First, they improve the quality of the software product or component by identifying and resolving defects early in the development process, preventing issues from reaching end-users, leading to enhanced customer satisfaction and reduced support requests.
- Second, reviews reduce the overall cost and time of the software development project by catching defects early, saving time, and resources that would otherwise be needed to address issues in later stages of the development cycle.
- Third, they provide an opportunity for knowledge sharing and collaboration among team members, promoting best practices and fostering improved teamwork and productivity.
- Fourth, they ensure compliance with regulatory and industry standards by identifying issues that may be in violation of regulatory requirements or industry standards, allowing for corrective action to be taken before the product is released.
ISO/IEC 20246 is an internationally recognized standard that provides detailed guidelines for conducting reviews of work products during the software development process. The standard outlines team member roles and responsibilities and offers a range of review techniques to choose from, making the review process more efficient and effective.
The work product review process involves several main activities:
Planning :
During the planning phase, the following activities are performed:
- Defining the scope
- Estimating effort and timeframe
- Identifying review characteristics
- Selecting the people to participate in the review and allocating roles
- Defining entry and exit criteria
Initiating the review:
During the initial review phase, the following activities are performed:
- Distributing the work product and related material
- Explaining the scope, objectives, process, roles, and work products to the participants
- Answering any questions that participants may have about the review
Individual review:
During the individual review phase, participants perform the following activities:
- Reviewing all or part of the work product
- Noting potential defects, recommendations, and questions
Issue communication and analysis:
During the issue communication and analysis phase, the following activities are performed:
- Communicating identified potential defects
- Analyzing potential defects and assigning ownership and status to them
- Evaluating and documenting quality characteristics
- Evaluating the review findings against the exit criteria to make a review decision
Fixing and reporting:
During the fixing and reporting phase, the following activities are performed:
- Creating defect reports for findings that require changes to a work product
- Fixing defects found in the work product reviewed
- Communicating defects to the appropriate person or team and recording the updated status of defects
- Gathering metrics
- Checking those exit criteria are met
- Accepting the work product when the exit criteria are reached
In a formal review, there are several roles and responsibilities that are typically assigned to participants.
Roles and Responsibilities:
- Moderator/Chairperson: Responsible for conducting the review meeting. It ensures that the review is conducted according to the review process, and ensures that the review objectives are met.
- Author: The person who wrote the work product being reviewed.
- Reviewer: A person who is responsible for reading and analyzing the work product being reviewed and identifying any defects, issues, or potential improvements.
- Recorder/Scribe: Responsible for recording the minutes of the review meeting and documenting the issues raised, the decisions made, and any action items assigned.
- Manager: A person who is responsible for managing the review process and ensuring that the review is conducted effectively.
- Quality Assurance Representative: Responsible for ensuring that the review process is in compliance with organizational quality standards and procedures.
- Technical Expert: A person who has expertise in the subject matter being reviewed. Also, the person who can provide technical advice and guidance during the review process.
Each of these roles has specific responsibilities and tasks that are assigned to them during the review process. So to ensure a successful review, it is crucial to clearly communicate the roles, responsibilities, processes, and objectives to each participant. This will ensure everyone is aligned and comprehends their expected roles during the review.
Types of reviews include:
Additionally, there are several types of reviews that can be conducted during the software development lifecycle
- Peer Review: A review of a work product involves one or more peers with comparable expertise and authority level.
- Technical Review: A review that focuses on the technical aspects of a work product, such as design, code, or architecture.
- Walkthrough: A review that involves the author of the work product presenting the work product to a group of reviewers, who ask questions and provide feedback.
- Inspection: A highly formal and structured review that involves a team of reviewers examining a work product in detail to identify defects and potential improvements.
- Audit: A review that focuses on ensuring compliance with standards, regulations, or policies.
- Management Review: A review that is conducted by management to ensure that the project or work product is progressing as planned and to identify any potential issues or risks.
Review type choice depends on factors like work product nature, review goals, and available resources.
Conclusion:
Reviews are a critical component of the software development lifecycle. By tapping into the collective knowledge and expertise of team members, reviews enable the early identification of defects and potential improvements, leading to improved software quality and reduced costs and time. Furthermore, reviews facilitate communication and collaboration among team members, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and knowledge sharing.
In addition, reviews help organizations to comply with regulatory and industry standards, thereby mitigating risks and maintaining the trust of their stakeholders. Overall, reviews are a valuable tool for any software development team aiming to deliver high-quality software products efficiently and effectively.
4
Apurva is a Test Engineer, with 3+ years of experience in Manual and automation testing. Having hands-on experience in testing Web as well as Mobile applications in Selenium and Playwright BDD with Java. And loves to explore and learn new tools and technologies.