How to Setup CI/CD Pipeline for automated API Tests

How to Setup CI/CD Pipeline for automated API Tests

Automating API test suite execution through CI/CD pipelines provides a significant advantage over local execution. By leveraging CI/CD, teams can obtain test results for all systems, improving the speed, quality, and reliability of tests. Manual triggering of API suite execution is not required, freeing up valuable time for team members.

In this blog post, we will guide you through the creation of a workflow file using GitHub Actions for your automated API tests. However, before diving into the creation of a CI/CD workflow, it’s essential to understand some crucial points for a better grasp of the concept.

Before we start creating a CI/CD workflow for our API tests I will suggest you first go through the API test automation framework here and also read this blog on creating a web test automation framework as it helps you to understand the different points which we all should consider before selecting the test automation framework. The API test automation framework is in Python language and has Behave library for BDD purposes.

Let’s understand some basic and important points to start with the CI/CD workflow.

What is DevOps?

DevOps is a set of practices and tools that integrate and automate tasks in the software development and IT industry. It establishes communication and collaboration between development and operations teams, enabling faster and more reliable software build, testing, and release processes. DevOps is a methodology that derives its name from the combination of “Development” and “Operations.”

The primary goal of DevOps is to bridge the gap between development and operations teams by fostering a culture of shared responsibility and collaboration. This helps to reduce the time it takes to develop, test, and deploy software while maintaining high quality and reliability standards. By automating manual processes and eliminating silos between teams, DevOps enables organizations to respond more quickly to changing market demands and customer needs.

To know more about DevOps and its history, please visit the site https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DevOps 

CI/CD-1

What is CI/CD?

CI/CD refers to Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery, which are processes and practices that help to deliver code changes more frequently and reliably. These processes involve automating the building, testing, and deployment of code changes, resulting in faster and higher-quality software releases for end-users.

The CI/CD pipeline follows a workflow that starts with continuous integration (CI), followed by continuous delivery (CD). The CI process involves integrating code changes into a shared repository and automatically building and testing them to identify errors early in the development process. Once the code has been tested and approved, the CD process takes over and automates the delivery of code changes to production environments.

The CI/CD pipeline workflow helps to reduce the risks and delays associated with manual code integration and deployment while ensuring that the changes are tested and delivered quickly and reliably. This approach enables organizations to innovate faster, respond more quickly to market demands, and improve overall software quality.

Process:

CI/CD-2

What are GitHub Actions?

GitHub Actions is a feature that makes it easy to automate software workflows, including world-class CI/CD capabilities. With GitHub Actions, you can build, test, and deploy your code directly from GitHub, while also customizing code reviews, branch management, and issue-triaging workflows to suit your needs.

To learn more about GitHub Actions, please refer to the official documentation available here
https://docs.github.com/en/actions

The GitHub platform offers integration with GitHub Actions, providing flexibility for customizing workflows to automate tasks such as building, testing, and deploying code. Developers can create custom workflows using GitHub Actions that are automatically triggered when specific events occur, such as code push, pull request merge, or as per a defined schedule.

Workflows are defined using YAML syntax, which is a human-readable data serialization language. YAML is commonly used for configuration files and in applications to store or transmit data. To learn more about YAML syntax and its history, please visit the following link

Advantages / Benefits of using GitHub Actions for CI/CD Pipeline:

  • Seamless integration: GitHub Actions seamlessly integrates with GitHub repositories, making it easy to automate workflows and tasks directly from the repository.
  • Highly customizable: GitHub Actions offers a high degree of customization, allowing developers to create workflows that suit their specific needs.
  • Time-saving: GitHub Actions automates many tasks in the software development process, saving developers time and reducing the potential for errors.
  • Flexible: GitHub Actions can be used for a wide range of tasks, including building, testing, and deploying applications.
  • Workflow visualization: GitHub Actions provides a graphical representation of workflows, making it easy for developers to visualize and understand the process.
  • Large community: GitHub Actions has a large and active community, providing a wealth of resources, documentation, and support for developers.
  • Cost Saving: GitHub Actions come bundled with Github free and enterprise licenses reducing the cost of maintaining separate CI/CD tools like Jenkins

Framework Overview:

This is a BDD API automation testing framework. The reason behind choosing the BDD framework is simple it provides you the following benefits over other testing frameworks. 

  • Improved Collaboration
  • Increased Test coverage
  • Better Test Readability
  • Easy Test Maintenance
  • Faster Feedback
  • Integration with Other Tools
  • Focus on Business Requirements

Discover what are the different types of automation testing frameworks available and why to prefer the BDD framework over others here

Framework Explanation:

The framework is simple because we included a feature file written in the Gherkin language, as you will notice. Basically, Gherkin is a simple plain text language with a simple structure. The feature file is easy to understand for a non-technical person and that is why we prefer the BDD framework for automation. To learn more about the Gherkin language please visit the official site here https://cucumber.io/docs/gherkin/reference/. Also, we have included the POST, GET, PUT & DELETE API methods. A feature file describes all these methods using simple and understandable language.

The next component of our framework is the step file. The feature and step files are the two main and most essential parts of the BDD framework. The step file contains the implementation of the steps mentioned in the feature file. It maps the respective steps from the feature file and executes the code.We use the behave library to achieve this. The behave understands the maps of the steps with the feature file steps as both steps have the same language structure. 

Then there is the utility file which contains the methods which we can use more repeatedly. There is one configuration file where we store the commonly used data. Furthermore, to install all the dependencies, we have created a requirement.txt file which contains the packages with specific versions. To install the packages from the requirement.txt file we have the following command. 

pip install -r requirement.txt

The above framework is explained in detail here. I suggest you please check out the blog first and understand the framework then we can move further with the workflow detail description. A proper understanding of the framework is essential to understand how to create the CI/CD workflow file.  

How to create a Workflow File?

  • Create a GitHub repository for your framework
  • Push your framework to that repository
  • Click on the Action Button
  • Click on set workflow your self option
  • Give a proper name to the workflow file

“Additionally, please check out the below video for a detailed step understanding.” The video will show you how to create workflow files and the steps need to follow to do so. 

github actions workflow file creation

Components of CI/CD Workflow File:

Events:

Events are responsible to trigger the CI/CD workflow file. They are nothing but the actions that happen in the repository for example pushing to the branch or creating a pull request. Please check the below sample events that trigger the CI/CD workflow file. 

  • push: This event is triggered when someone pushes code to a branch in your repository.
  • pull_request: This event is triggered when someone opens a new pull request or updates an existing one.
  • schedule: This event is triggered on a schedule that you define in your workflow configuration file.
  • workflow_dispatch: This event allows you to manually trigger a workflow by clicking a button in the GitHub UI.
  • release: This event is triggered when a new release is created in your repository.
  • repository_dispatch: This event allows you to trigger a workflow using a custom webhook event.
  • page_build: This event is triggered when GitHub Pages are built or rebuilt.
  • issue_comment: This event is triggered when someone comments on an issue in your repository.
  • pull_request_review: This event is triggered when someone reviews a pull request in your repository.
  • push_tag: This event is triggered when someone pushes a tag to your repository.

To know more about the events that trigger workflows please check out the GitHub official documentation here

Jobs:

After setting up the events to trigger the workflow the next step is to set up the job for the workflow. The job consists of a set of steps that performs specific tasks. For every job, there is a separate runner or we can call it a virtual machine (VM) therefore each job can run parallelly. This allows us to execute multiple tasks concurrently. 

A workflow can have more than one job with a unique name and set of steps that define the actions to perform. For example, we can use a job in the workflow file to build the project, test its functionality, and deploy it to a server. The defined jobs in the workflow file can be dependent on each other. Also, they can have different requirements than the others like specific operating systems, software dependencies or packages, or environment variables. 

Discover more about using jobs in a workflow from GitHub’s official documentation here

Runners:

To execute the jobs we need runners. The runners in GitHub actions are nothing but virtual machines or physical servers. GitHub categorizes them into two parts named self-hosted or provided by GitHub. Moreover, the runners are responsible for running the steps described in the job.

The self-hosed runners allow us to execute the jobs on our own system or infrastructure for example our own physical servers, virtual machines, or containers. We use self-hosted runners when we need to run jobs on specialized hardware requirements that must be met.

GitHub-hosted runners are provided by GitHub itself and can be used for free by anyone. These runners are available in a variety of configurations. Furthermore, the best thing about GitHub-hosted runners is that they automatically update with the latest software updates and security patches.

Learn more about runners for GitHub actions workflow here from GitHub’s official documentation. 

Steps:

Steps in the workflow file are used to carry out particular actions. Subsequently, after adding the runner to the workflow file, we define these steps with the help of the steps property in the workflow file. Additionally, the steps consist of actions and commands to perform on the build. For example, there are steps to download the dependencies, check out the build, run the test, upload the artifacts, etc. 

Learn more about the steps used in the workflow file from GitHub’s official documentation here

Actions:

In the GitHub actions workflow file, we use actions that are reusable code modules that can be shared across different workflows and repositories. One or more steps are defined under actions to perform specific tasks such as running tests, building the project, or deploying the code. We can also define the input and output parameters to the actions which help us to receive and return the data from other steps in the workflow. Developers describe the actions, and they are available on GitHub Marketplace. To use an action in the workflow, we need to use the uses property.

Find out more about actions for GitHub actions from GitHub’s official documentation here 

Now we have covered all the basic topics that we need to understand before creating our CI/CD workflow file for the API automation framework. Now, let’s start explaining the workflow file.

CI/CD Workflow File:

name: Python API CI/CD Pipeline
on:
  push:
   branches: ["main"]
#    schedule:
#       - cron: '00 12 * * *'
jobs:
 build:
  runs-on: windows-latest
  steps:
    - uses: actions/checkout@v3
    - name: Set up Python
      uses: actions/setup-python@v3
      with:
        python-version: '3.8.9'
    - name: Install dependencies
      run: |
        python -m pip install --upgrade pip
        pip && pip install -r requirement.txt
    - name: install allure
      run:  npm install -g allure-commandline
      continue-on-error: true
    - name: run test
      run: behave Features -f allure_behave.formatter:AllureFormatter -o Report_Json
      working-directory: .
      continue-on-error: true
    - name: html report
      run: allure generate Report_Json -o Report_Html --clean
      continue-on-error: true
    - uses: actions/upload-artifact@v2
      with:
          name: HTML reports
          path: Report_Html
      continue-on-error: true

Explanation:

Name:

  • We use the name property to give the name to the workflow file. It is a good practice to give a proper name to your workflow file. Generally, the name is related to the feature or the repository name. 
name: Python API CI/CD Pipeline

Event:

Now we have to set up the event that triggers the workflow file. In this workflow, I have added two events for your reference. The pipeline will trigger the push event for the ‘main‘ branch. Additionally, I added the scheduled event to automatically trigger the workflow as per the set schedule.

on:
   push:
    branches: ["main"]
#    schedule:
#       - cron: '00 12 * * *'

The above schedule indicates that the pipeline Runs at 12:00. Action schedules run at most every 5 minutes using UTC time.

We can customize the schedule timing as per our needs. Check out the following chron specification diagram to learn how to set the schedule timing.

Job:

The job we are setting here is to build. We want to build the project and perform the required tasks as we merge new code changes.

jobs:
  build:

Runner:

The runner we are using here is a GitHub-hosted runner. In this workflow, we are using a Windows-latest virtual machine. The VM will build the project, and then it will execute the defined steps.

runs-on: windows-latest

Apart from Windows-latest, there are other runners too like ubuntu-latest, macos-latest, and self-hosted. The self-hosted runner is one that we can set up on our own infrastructure, such as our own server, or virtual machine, allowing us to have more control over the environment and resources.

Steps:

The steps are the description of what are the different actions required to perform on the project build. Here, the first action we are performing is to check out the repository so that it can have the latest build code. 

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v3

Then we are setting up the Python. As this framework is an API automation testing framework using Python and Behave so we need Python to execute the tests. 

- name: Set up Python
  uses: actions/setup-python@v3
      with:
         python-version: '3.8.9'

After we install Python, we also need to install the different packages required to run the API tests. Define these packages in the requirement.txt file, and we can install them using the following command.

- name: Install dependencies
      run: |
        python -m pip install --upgrade pip
        pip && pip install -r requirement.txt

For reporting purposes, we are using allure reports. To generate the allure report we need to install the allure package separately.

- name: install allure
  run:  npm install -g allure-commandline
  continue-on-error: true

As of now, we have installed all the packages and we can now run our API tests. We are running these tests with the help of the allure behave command so that once the execution is completed it will generate a Report_Json folder which is required to generate the HTML report. 

- name: run test
 run: behave Features -f allure_behave.formatter:AllureFormatter -o Report_Json
 working-directory: .
 continue-on-error: true

Here, we cannot share the generated Report_Json folder as a report. To generate the shareable report we need to convert the JSON folder to that of the HTML report. 

- name: html report
run: allure generate Report_Json -o Report_Html --clean
continue-on-error: true

To view the report locally we need to upload the artifacts first and then only we can download the generated HTML result. 

- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v2
     with:
          name: HTML reports
          path: Report_Html
          continue-on-error: true

How to download and view the HTML Report?

Please find the attached GitHub repository link. I have uploaded the same project to this repository and also attached a Readme file that explains the framework and the different commands we have used so far in this project. Also, the workflow explanation is included for better understanding.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, creating a CI/CD pipeline workflow for your project using GitHub Actions streamlines the development and testing process by automating tasks such as building the project for new changes, testing the build, and deploying the code. This results in reduced time and minimized errors, ensuring that your software performance is at its best.

GitHub Actions provides a wide range of pre-built actions and the ability to create custom actions that suit your requirements. By following established practices and continuously iterating on workflows, you can ensure your software delivery is optimized and reliable.

I hope in this blog I have provided the answers to the most commonly asked question and I hope this will help you to start creating your CI/CD pipelines for your projects. Do check out the blogs on how to create a BDD framework for Web Automation and API automation for a better understanding of automation frameworks and how a robust framework can be created. 

What are Reviews in Software Testing and why are they Important?

What are Reviews in Software Testing and why are they Important?

Static testing and dynamic testing are two essential approaches in software testing. While dynamic testing involves software execution, static testing examines work products, such as code or documentation, without execution. Static testing includes two methods: manual examination, where team members review work products to identify issues, and tool-driven evaluation, where specialized software tools perform static analysis.

Static testing is a critical technique as it can identify errors and defects in the software development lifecycle before software execution takes place. This can save time and resources by catching issues early, leading to improved software quality. Static testing also helps in improving the maintainability of the software and reducing the cost of testing by identifying issues early on. By detecting defects early, static testing can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the entire software development process.

What are Reviews in Software Testing:

In software testing, a review is a process of examining a software product or component by a group of individuals to detect defects, errors, or vulnerabilities. The primary goal of reviews is to identify and fix issues in the early stages of the software development life cycle to save time and cost.

Reviews play a crucial role in the software development process. It identifies and addresses errors and issues before they become problematic. Reviews can be informal or formal, depending on the level of rigor and structure involved.

Informal reviews are often less structured and involve team members informally reviewing code or other work products and discussing issues. On the other hand, formal reviews are more structured, involving documented procedures, and a diverse team with varied roles and perspectives, making them comprehensive.

Formal reviews typically produce documented results, including any issues identified and how they were resolved. This documentation is useful for tracking progress, ensuring accountability, and improving future reviews’ quality. Overall, reviews are essential to the software development process as they ensure the software is of high quality and meets the desired requirements.

Reasons why Reviews are Important:

  • First, they improve the quality of the software product or component by identifying and resolving defects early in the development process, preventing issues from reaching end-users, leading to enhanced customer satisfaction and reduced support requests.
  • Second, reviews reduce the overall cost and time of the software development project by catching defects early, saving time, and resources that would otherwise be needed to address issues in later stages of the development cycle.
  • Third, they provide an opportunity for knowledge sharing and collaboration among team members, promoting best practices and fostering improved teamwork and productivity.
  • Fourth, they ensure compliance with regulatory and industry standards by identifying issues that may be in violation of regulatory requirements or industry standards, allowing for corrective action to be taken before the product is released.

ISO/IEC 20246 is an internationally recognized standard that provides detailed guidelines for conducting reviews of work products during the software development process. The standard outlines team member roles and responsibilities and offers a range of review techniques to choose from, making the review process more efficient and effective.

The work product review process involves several main activities:

Planning :

During the planning phase, the following activities are performed:

  • Defining the scope
  • Estimating effort and timeframe
  • Identifying review characteristics
  • Selecting the people to participate in the review and allocating roles
  • Defining entry and exit criteria

Initiating the review:

During the initial review phase, the following activities are performed:

  • Distributing the work product and related material
  • Explaining the scope, objectives, process, roles, and work products to the participants
  • Answering any questions that participants may have about the review

Individual review:

During the individual review phase, participants perform the following activities:

  • Reviewing all or part of the work product
  • Noting potential defects, recommendations, and questions

Issue communication and analysis:

During the issue communication and analysis phase, the following activities are performed:

  • Communicating identified potential defects
  • Analyzing potential defects and assigning ownership and status to them
  • Evaluating and documenting quality characteristics
  • Evaluating the review findings against the exit criteria to make a review decision

 Fixing and reporting:

During the fixing and reporting phase, the following activities are performed:

  • Creating defect reports for findings that require changes to a work product
  • Fixing defects found in the work product reviewed
  • Communicating defects to the appropriate person or team and recording the updated status of defects
  • Gathering metrics
  • Checking those exit criteria are met
  • Accepting the work product when the exit criteria are reached

In a formal review, there are several roles and responsibilities that are typically assigned to participants.

Roles and Responsibilities:

  • Moderator/Chairperson: Responsible for conducting the review meeting. It ensures that the review is conducted according to the review process, and ensures that the review objectives are met.
  • Author: The person who wrote the work product being reviewed.
  • Reviewer: A person who is responsible for reading and analyzing the work product being reviewed and identifying any defects, issues, or potential improvements.
  • Recorder/Scribe: Responsible for recording the minutes of the review meeting and documenting the issues raised, the decisions made, and any action items assigned.
  • Manager: A person who is responsible for managing the review process and ensuring that the review is conducted effectively.
  • Quality Assurance Representative: Responsible for ensuring that the review process is in compliance with organizational quality standards and procedures.
  • Technical Expert: A person who has expertise in the subject matter being reviewed. Also, the person who can provide technical advice and guidance during the review process.

Each of these roles has specific responsibilities and tasks that are assigned to them during the review process. So to ensure a successful review, it is crucial to clearly communicate the roles, responsibilities, processes, and objectives to each participant. This will ensure everyone is aligned and comprehends their expected roles during the review.

Types of reviews include:

Additionally, there are several types of reviews that can be conducted during the software development lifecycle

  • Peer Review: A review of a work product involves one or more peers with comparable expertise and authority level.
  • Technical Review: A review that focuses on the technical aspects of a work product, such as design, code, or architecture.
  • Walkthrough: A review that involves the author of the work product presenting the work product to a group of reviewers, who ask questions and provide feedback.
  • Inspection: A highly formal and structured review that involves a team of reviewers examining a work product in detail to identify defects and potential improvements.
  • Audit: A review that focuses on ensuring compliance with standards, regulations, or policies.
  • Management Review: A review that is conducted by management to ensure that the project or work product is progressing as planned and to identify any potential issues or risks.

Review type choice depends on factors like work product nature, review goals, and available resources.

Conclusion:

Reviews are a critical component of the software development lifecycle. By tapping into the collective knowledge and expertise of team members, reviews enable the early identification of defects and potential improvements, leading to improved software quality and reduced costs and time. Furthermore, reviews facilitate communication and collaboration among team members, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and knowledge sharing.

In addition, reviews help organizations to comply with regulatory and industry standards, thereby mitigating risks and maintaining the trust of their stakeholders. Overall, reviews are a valuable tool for any software development team aiming to deliver high-quality software products efficiently and effectively.

Read more blogs here

Testing Android and iOS Mobile Applications on real devices using BrowserStack

Testing Android and iOS Mobile Applications on real devices using BrowserStack

To ensure comprehensive mobile app testing, it is essential to do 360-degree testing for functions, appearance, and performance on multiple devices with various configurations, sizes, resolutions, and platforms.

There are three ways to conduct mobile app testing:

  1. Emulators for Android devices and Simulators for iOS devices
  2. Real physical devices
  3. Cloud-based real devices platform

Testing an application on different platforms, including emulators and simulators, as well as physical devices, comes with a set of challenges.

Emulators and Simulators:

 When it comes to emulators and simulators, creating multiple virtual devices with different configurations can be difficult, and they may not accurately replicate real-world situations compared to physical devices.

Physical devices:

 On the other hand, testing on physical devices poses its own set of difficulties. It requires a large number of devices to test app compatibility with different configurations, and the list of devices keeps changing as new models are introduced to the market. Additionally, cross-location testing can be challenging since carrying multiple devices across different locations can be cumbersome.

To address these challenges, a possible solution is to use cloud-based platforms for testing applications in real-world conditions. By doing so, we can perform robust testing with a variety of devices and configurations without the need to physically acquire and maintain them.

Cloud-based platform (BrowserStack) :

 BrowserStack is a cloud-based real devices platform that provides support for both manual and automated testing of mobile apps for both Android and iOS devices. 

One of its standout features is the App Live feature, which allows users to manually test their mobile apps on over 3000 real Android and iOS devices.

BrowserStack also supports 15+ native features, such as GPS, network simulation, and localization, which can be used to test mobile apps in real-world scenarios. 

Other features include debugging apps, viewing crash reports and logs, inspecting UI elements, and using stack traces to find and fix bugs instantly. These features make it easy for developers to identify and fix issues quickly and efficiently.

Furthermore, BrowserStack supports testing across different environments, including Dev, QA, Staging, and Production apps from the play store or app store. This makes it easy for developers to test their apps in various environments and ensure that they are working correctly in each environment.

To test a mobile app on BrowserStack, follow these steps:

1. Create a BrowserStack account by signing up at https://www.browserstack.com/users/sign_up

2. Log in to your BrowserStack account.

3. Navigate to the “App Live” section.

4. Here in the left panel “SELECT SOURCE” you can see different options available to upload or install apps.

i. Uploaded Apps – You can upload an apk or ipa file here.

ii. Sync with App Centre – If you have access to the app center you can use this option to directly install the app from App Centre.

iii. Install via TestFlight – While testing on iOS devices you can install the app directly from TestFlight also.

iv. Install via Play Store – Select a device, sign in to the play store and install the app if available on Play Store.

v. Install via App Store – Select a device, sign in to the App store and install an app, if available on App Store.

Now let’s explore how to upload apk file from a local machine using Upload Apps here…

i. Click on Upload – Select apk/ipa file from your local machine to be uploaded.

ii. Select the uploaded apk/ipa file and device from the list of available devices in the right panel.

iii. You can select any device from the list for the selected device category.

iv. Once you click on the device name the device will be launched and the app will be installed on it.

 Now once the app is launched on the selected device you can start testing the app.

Let’s explore various features that can be used effectively while testing…

1. Report Bug:

If you find a bug while testing, BrowserStack provides the option to highlight the bug on the screen and add a bug description. 

You can download the image to include it in the defect report later or send a screenshot to the developer or your team via email. 

Additionally, you can share the image using various applications such as Jira, Slack, GitHub, etc. This option is visible in the screenshot below.

Then click on Cancel to return back to the testing screen.

2. Record Session:

This feature can capture a video recording of a sequence of events that led to a bug.

Choose the screen to be recorded.

After recording a session using BrowserStack, you can stop the sharing by clicking on the “Stop Sharing” button. Then, you can download the recording for later use.

3. Switch Device  

This feature allows users to switch to another device at any point in time to test the same app on different devices. 

The toolbar on the right side of BrowserStack provides various features to simulate real device features, including:

  • View open apps on the device.
  • Kill existing apps if they become unresponsive or test app behavior on a relaunch.
  • Capture screenshots, similar to taking screenshots on a physical phone.
  • Rotate the screen to test the app’s responsiveness to different screen orientations.

Some other important features are:

  1. Change Location: This feature is used to test app behavior and response across different geographical locations. You can use the “Device GPS” option to set the exact latitude and longitude coordinates or the “IP Location (Beta)” option to select a specific region from a list of locations. See the screenshot below for reference.
  1. Change Language – This feature can be used to test apps in different languages. 
  1. File & Media – This feature allows you to transfer various types of files to and from the device during testing.

On the right-hand side of the window, we have the following options in the Dev Tools section:

  1. INSPECT (BETA) –This option is used to find element locators for app automation testing.
  1. NETWORK Tab – This feature is useful for monitoring backend HTTP requests and responses in real-time. It can help you to debug the cause of failures during certain events in the app.

On the BrowserStack cloud platform, you can also test various native device features just like physical devices. These include:

  • Geolocation testing
  • Push notifications
  • Pre-loaded images
  • Network simulation
  • Testing dependent apps
  • Uninstalling apps

Conclusion:

Overall, BrowserStack is a convenient and easy-to-use cloud-based real devices platform that provides a wide range of features for mobile app testing. Its support for manual and automated testing, along with its native features and ability to test across different environments, makes it a popular choice among developers.

Read more blogs here